The Defense Base Act provides death benefits to the survivors of contractors killed overseas. Recently, a rocket strike in Iraq killed Mr. Nawres Waleed Hamid, a contractor-linguist for Valiant Integrated Services. News outlets report that a widow and two minor children survived Mr. Hamid. More likely than not, Mr. Hamid’s widow and minor children are entitled to Defense Base Act death benefits. What Are Defense Base Act Death Benefits? The Defense Base Act is an extension of the Longshore and Harbor Workers’ Compensation Act. Therefore, the Longshore’s Act’s statute for the payment of death benefits controls. The relevant statute is 33 U.S.C. 909, often referred to as Section 9. When a decedent is survived by a widow and minor children, then those children are the preferred class of beneficiaries. In this situation, the pertinent language from Section 9 states: If the injury causes death, the compensation therefrom shall beRead more
What is the Defense Base Act? How Do You File a DBA Claim?
The Defense Base Act is the best kept secret in the contracting world. But, if a claimant is injured at work, they might hear about the Defense Base Act through their employer, co-workers, or Internet searches. This post discusses some basics about the DBA, and it ends with an invitation to contact Strongpoint Law Firm if you would like additional information. What is the Defense Base Act? The Defense Base Act is workers’ compensation. Injured workers may file claims for weekly compensation and medical benefits. Congress enacted the DBA during World War 2, using the Longshore and Harbor Workers’ Compensation Act as the framework. Longshore Act law applies unless the DBA says otherwise. But, there is also a unique doctrine that applies to DBA claims called the zone of special danger doctrine. Basically, the zone of special danger expands an insurance carrier’s liability to cover work injuries that happen overseas.Read more
The Defense Base Act and MOD FOURTEEN’s Minimal Fitness Standards
The U.S. Central Command recently released MOD FOURTEEN, which identifies the current minimal fitness standards required for deployment to the USCENTCOM Area of Responsibility (as of October 2019). Why is MOD FOURTEEN Important? MOD FOURTEEN, just like earlier MODs, is extremely important for Defense Base Act claims. Why? Because if a contractor cannot satisfy MOD FOURTEEN’s fitness standards, then the contractor is unemployable in any USCENTCOM country. Think about it in terms of releases to return to work. MOD FOURTEEN defines the absolute minimal physical and mental fitness requirements for a return to work after an overseas work injury. If the claimant does not meet the minimal standards, the claimant may not deploy absent a medical waiver. Total Versus Partial Disability and Labor Market Surveys: In a Defense Base Act claim, an injured claimant who cannot return to their pre-injury job is presumed to be totally disabled. Total disability means thatRead more
International-Matex: 5th Circuit Addresses Situs, Status, MMI, and SAE
Recently, the Fifth Circuit published an important Longshore and Harbor Workers’ Compensation Act decision: International-Matex Tank Terminals v. Director, OWCP. The issues included maritime situs, maritime status, the concept of maximum medical improvement, and the claimant’s efforts to locate suitable alternative employment. Maritime Situs: The Longshore Act applies to claimants injured “on a maritime situs.” That means an injury must have “occurr[ed] upon the navigable waters of the United States (including any adjoining pier, wharf, dry dock, terminal, building way, marine railway, or other adjoining area customarily used by an employer in loading, unloading, repairing dismantling, or building a vessel.” See 33 U.S.C. 903(a). “Situs” has both a geographical and a functional component. The geographical component asks whether the area of injury “adjoined” navigable waters. “Adjoining” means “border on” or “be contiguous with” navigable waters. The functional component asks whether the area of injury is either included expressly in the list of possible injuries in 33Read more
Medical Marijuana, the Defense Base Act, and the MORE Act of 2019
Workers’ compensation pays for medical benefits. In the Defense Base Act world, employers and insurance companies “shall furnish such medical, surgical, and other attendance or treatment, nurse and hospital service, medicine, crutches, and apparatus, for such period as the nature of the injury or the process of recovery may require.” See 33 U.S.C. 907(a). But there is a problem with marijuana. It has not yet been decriminalized at the federal level. While it is true that some states allow recreational marijuana use and many states allow the use of medical marijuana, the Defense Base Act is a federal workers’ compensation system. So, does the status of the DBA as a federal workers’ compensation system outweigh the medicinal quality of the substance at issue? On the one hand, some people argue that medical marijuana should be covered in Defense Base Act claims where the claimant resides in a state where medical marijuana is legal.Read more
Can a Carrier Compel a War Hazards Depo in an Undisputed DBA Claim?
Recently, a handful of defense attorneys have demanded a claimant’s War Hazards Compensation Act deposition while the case is still at the Office of Workers’ Compensation Programs. The cases are in pay status because the claimants became disabled after a work-related injury. There are no issues in dispute. Yet, the defense attorneys demand live, in-person depositions (sometimes in a foreign country). That begs the question: can an insurance carrier or its defense attorneys compel a claimant in a non-disputed case to participate in a deposition so that the carrier can get War Hazards Compensation Act facts? The Deposition’s Purpose: You may be wondering why an insurance carrier even wants a deposition in an undisputed claim. More likely than not, the desire is an offshoot of the mechanism of injury. When a Defense Base Act injury and disability is caused by a “war-risk hazard,” then the insurance carrier is entitled toRead more
Upgraded OALJ Search Engine for Longshore/DBA Claims
Public Service Announcement: the Office of Administrative Law Judges (“OALJ”) recently implemented a new and improved search engine for its website. It is very helpful. The search engine allows users to narrow down search results based on a number of different filters. For example, the Keyword Search option has the following filters: Agencies and Courts. Document Category, including “Decision-related documents.” Program Area. Select Longshore for claims falling under the Longshore and Harbor Workers’ Compensation Act and the Defense Base Act. Although there is a filter called, “DBA, SCA, and Related,” the DBA referred to in that quotation is the Davis Bacon Act, not the Defense Base Act. Case Type. Select “LHC” for Longshore claims and “LDA” for Defense Base Act claims. OALJ Document Type. This is an interesting filter because of the number of sub-filters that a searcher may select. There are Orders, Attorney Fee Decisions, Motions for Reconsideration/ModificationRead more
Requiring the Defense’s Billing Records in Longshore/DBA Fee Disputes
When a claimant prevails in a Longshore or Defense Base Act claim, then the claimant may be entitled to shift the payment of attorney’s fees to the employer and its insurance carrier. See 33 U.S.C. § 928; see also Dyer v. Cenex Harvest States Co-op., 563 F.3d 1044, 1047 (9th Cir. 2009). Congress enacted the attorney fee statute in 1972 to incentivize employers to pay valid claims rather than contest them. Hunt v. Director, OWCP, 999 F.2d 419, 424 (9th Cir. 1993). Requiring shifting fees when a claimant must protect their rights makes sure that the money for the litigation does not come out of the claimant’s compensation payments. Sometimes, however, fee disputes arise between the successful claimant’s attorney and the insurance carrier’s attorney. In a fee dispute, the insurance carrier’s attorney objects to the successful attorney’s fee petition. But, what if the insurance carrier’s attorney’s objections are bogus when comparedRead more
Contractor and Troop Levels in Afghanistan and Iraq: 2007-2018
The Congressional Research Service recently published an updated report identifying the number of contractors employed in Afghanistan, Iraq, and Syria. The report, entitled Department of Defense Contractor and Troop Levels in Afghanistan and Iraq: 2007-2018, is available online through the following hyperlink: https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/R/R44116. What is a Contractor? The Code of Federal Regulations defines a defense contractor as “any individual, firm, corporation, partnership, or other legal non-federal entity that enters into a contract directly with the DOD to furnish services, supplies, or construction.” The report’s definition goes a step further: Within the defense policy community, the term contractor is commonly used in two different contexts. The word can describe the private companies with which DOD contracts to obtain goods and services. It can also describe individuals hired by DOD – usually through private companies, which are also considered contractors in the previous context – to perform specific tests. The term contractor does not refer toRead more
How Is Patterson v. Omniplex Analyzed in Defense Base Act Claims?
This post addresses Patterson and how administrative law judges analyze global labor market surveys in Defense Base Act claims. Suitable Alternative Employment–Generally: In Defense Base Act claims, the parties must eventually discuss the employment opportunities available to an injured worker. It is the availability of suitable alternative employment (“SAE”) that changes the classification of an injury from total to partial. Louisiana Ins. Guar. Ass’n v. Abbott, 40 F.3d 122, 126 (5th Cir. 1994). Discussing SAE is inevitable. It is an employer’s burden to prove the availability of SAE. Norfolk Shipbuilding & Drydock Corp. v. Hord, 193 F.3d 797, 800-01 (4th Cir. 1999). Usually, the employer’s insurance carrier will hire a vocational expert to prepare a labor market survey. The survey must “demonstrate the reasonable availability of suitable alternative employment in the open labor market.” Id. at 800. The carrier myst consider the injured worker’s age background, physical and mental capabilities, and whether jobsRead more
- 1
- 2
- 3
- …
- 36
- Next Page »
